Nevada judge stalls execution after company objects to use of its drug
Judge ruled Alvogen has reasonable likelihood of winning lawsuit and issued restraining order against utilize of midazolam
A Nevada judge effectively set the execution of a two-time murderer on hold on Wednesday after a pharmaceutical company objected to the use of one of its medications to set someone to death.
Judge Elizabeth Gonzalez of Clark county district disallowed the use of the narcotic in a ruling that came down less than nine hours before Scott Raymond Dozier, 47, was to be executed with a three-chemical injection never before tried in the US.
New Jersey-based Alvogen had recommended the magistrate to block the use of its sedative midazolam, saying that the country illegally obtained the product through subterfuge and intended to use it for unapproved purposes. The pharmaceutical company raised concerns that the narcotic could lead to a botched execution, citing suits that seemingly ran awry elsewhere around the country.
Todd Bice, an lawyer with Alvogen, accused the nation of deceptively obtaining the companys medication by having it shipped to a pharmacy in Las Vegas rather than the state prison in Ely. He said Alvogen had sent a letter to state officials in April telling them it opposes the use of its products in executings, particularly midazolam.
The judge ruled that based on that letter, Alvogen had a reasonable likelihood of winning its lawsuit, and she issued the temporary restraining order against the use of the drug. Gonzalez defined a hearing in the case for 10 September.
Alvogen said in a statement that it was pleased with the ruling and will continue to work through the legal system to ensure its products are not used in executions.
A second pharmaceutical company, Sandoz, also raised objections at Wednesday’s hearing to the use of one of its narcotics the muscle-paralyzing substance cisatracurium in the execution. But the company did not immediately ask to formally join Alvogen’s lawsuit.
A third company, Pfizer, last year demanded Nevada return the third medication intended for use in the execution, the powerful opioid fentanyl. But the state rejected. Fentanyl, which has been blamed for deadly overdoses across the country, has not been used before in an execution.
Jordan T Smith, an deputy Nevada solicitor general, countered at Wednesday’s hearing that Nevada did not put up a smokescreen or do anything wrong in getting the narcotics. He told drugs ordered by the nation prison system are regularly shipped to Las Vegas.
This whole action is just PR damage control, Smith told of Alvogen.
Pharmaceutical companies have defied the use of their drugs in executings for 10 years, quoting both legal and ethical concerns. However, the legal challenge filed by Alvogen is only the second of its kind in the US, said Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center in Washington. The previous challenge, filed last year by a different company in Arkansas, was ultimately unsuccessful in stopping that execution.
Bice said that Alvogen does not take a position on the death penalty itself but opposes the use of the medication in a way that is fundamentally contrary to the drugs purpose of saving and improving patient’s lives.
In court newspapers, Alvogen also quoth the risk of a botched execution, citing instances in Alabama, Arizona and Oklahoma in the past few years in which inmates were left pant or snort, appeared to regain consciousness or took an unusually long time to die.
Dozier, who attempted suicide in the past, has said he opts execution to life behind bars.
Dozier was sentenced to demise in 2007 for robbing, killing and dismembering 22 -year-old Jeremiah Miller at a Las Vegas motel in 2002. Miller had come to Nevada to buy ingredients to attain meth. His decapitated torso was found in a suitcase.
In 2005, Dozier was sentenced to 22 years in prison for shooting to death another drug-trade associate, 26 -year-old Jasen Greene, whose body was found in 2002 in a shallow tomb outside Phoenix.